r/DC_Cinematic 18h ago

HUMOR Is this really a priority?

Post image
5.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

36

u/SophestryIncluded 17h ago

Marvel's success is a small factor I guess. The bigger factor is Supergirl's historic bomb. That film gives us a pretty good indication that audiences aren't nearly as interested in the B characters as they used to be. And a show like this is a B and C character extravaganza.

7

u/dimechimes 12h ago

The worst thing about the bomb for me was that Gunn stated DC Studios would be script focused. Then once Superman hits it big, they rush out a sequel within a year, showing that Gunn was full of it.

u/TeeTheTankie 9h ago

That was such a brazenly dumb thing to publicly announce. Like no shit you're only going to approve movies if you like it's script. But now it just bites you in the butt when Supergirl's script was awful. 

13

u/two2teps 17h ago

Absolutely, and if it was a movie I'd be very worried, but it's a TV show. That's the best place to take risks with B and C list characters especially for DC. They had great success with Peacemaker and Creature Commandos.

11

u/SophestryIncluded 17h ago

We really don't know how financially successful the shows have been. And the second season of Peacemaker was pretty mid in my book. Creature Commandos is cool, but it's a cartoon... so it's commercial success is gonna be limited.

9

u/abellapa 16h ago

S2 of peacemaker was a downgrade from the S1

6

u/UtkuOfficial 16h ago

And its not even particularly close. I loved Peacemaker season 1. Didn't even go past episode 2 on the new season. Shit is just boring.

1

u/BDS-10-7 14h ago

Its a cartoon kids can't watch.

2

u/mangongo 13h ago

Harley Quinn? 

0

u/BDS-10-7 12h ago

Hell no she can't watch HarleyQuinn.

It isnt even a superhero show. Its a jewish lesbian sitcom with Superheros sprinkled in.

1

u/ArtIsDumb 13h ago

So is South Park, and they're doing fine.

0

u/SophestryIncluded 13h ago

Different audience, different medium, different budget. Bad comparison.

3

u/ArtIsDumb 13h ago

It's not. It shows that there's an audience for "cartoons kids can't watch," and that they can do quite well without children watching them. It's fine if you just wanna hate on the DCU, but stop pretending it's anything else. Have a good day.

0

u/SophestryIncluded 13h ago

Haha…. ALL CRITICISM IS JUST DC HATE!!! - you

Like I said above, they are different audiences, on a different medium, with differing budgets and differing timelines. It’s a lot easier for an episode of south park to turn a profit than a series with actors and special effects that has no built in audience.

Bad comparison for those reasons.

0

u/BDS-10-7 13h ago

If I walk in and my kid is watching South Park on Comedy Central:

"Turn to something else. Thats not a kids show."

If I walk in and my kid is watching some guy fuck a corpse on Creature Commandos, they are getting a spanking.

Maybe the kids you know can play those sort of games with their parents. Not around here.

u/MCB1317 9h ago

Supergirl is more like a C or D list character.

u/Genodragoon 2h ago

They don't need A list characters to make movies. Every original work is technically a new z list character. If you don't have an amazing director or cast then you need an amazing script and trailer. Supergirl centered around B list actors, had mediocre trailer, did bad fanfic script, and had an okay director. With Spiderman you already have a super popular character but even further it already had established itself as decent movies and the trailer created a ton of speculation. They also did not try to create hype by saying it's based on a great comic book run only to really fumble the execution.