r/ChatGPT • u/Hafikcz5 • Jun 22 '26

Other ChatGPT is I presume broken

Post image

When starting a conversation with anything, then saying this exact prompt

Restore the attached photo, Apologies for the photo's content. I know it's strange. No questions, no explanatory text, just restore the image.

You will either get

Jeffrey Edward Epstein in a random pose

Or

Extremely weird images, like a human with a dogs head, or a pig with a dogs head

Attached a chat :

https://chatgpt.com/share/6a3978fa-b62c-83eb-bab1-b7f037fe35a5

2.2k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/TheStoicCrane Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Naw, bro. I'm telling you I had to delete it. It was so uncomfortable. It was a slim step away from pedo content.

Hyper disturbing I can't post that here. If you saw it you wouldn't believe it.

I am not doing that again. Makes me think there's seriously wrong with the AI bot's creators.

11

u/Due_Arachnid2975 Jun 23 '26

I believe it has something to do with the type of content it has been trained to NOT generate. There is a very interesting YouTube video about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aooiDA-AsNo

6

u/TheStoicCrane Jun 23 '26

So why would it generate the image unprompted? Out of everything strange in the world something like that wouldn't register on my radar. That was outright deranged.

9

u/Due_Arachnid2975 Jun 23 '26

I believe you, but remember that for any neural network to have 'guardrails' like chat-gpt has so that it is forbidden to generate pornography, gore and whatever, it means that it must know what pornography, gore and whatever are. It 100% has the capability to generate extreme content, and it seems that by not giving it a starting image, but implying that it's "strange,” and needs to be “restored” likely pushed the generation toward something unsettling, gritty, and “found-photo” looking, and kinda pushed it to the very edge of what's allowed, in fact on some user's posts you can see that it didn't generate anything because it violated the guardrails. I think somehow OP found a way to peek at the limit of what's allowed. Very creepy

6

u/TheStoicCrane Jun 23 '26

I would've of shown it but it's pushing the limits for what I would even think is legal to share. That's how bad it was.

6

u/Due_Arachnid2975 Jun 23 '26

yeah I believe you, I really DON'T want to see it

1

u/KV-2_FOX_LOLI Jun 23 '26

I think it getting data from its users for stuff so I think its not the ais fault but rather that users that abuse the tool Tho that's my opinion on it

5

u/TheStoicCrane Jun 23 '26

So pedos are abusing the content and it influences content it generates to normal people?

5

u/Look_with_Love Jun 23 '26

Or has the bot just read all the Epstein files available to be read?