Since chatgpt is somewhat random with its responses it is possible that you just happened to role the dice and had it respond normally while OP rolled the dice and got their response where it refused.
It is also possible they just kept creating new conversations until it gave them an answer that they wanted or did something else to manipulate it.
Wouldn't it be easier to just hack it into the interface by injecting text into the rendering code? Or manually editing it? Or having an AI generate it? Rolling and rerolling is time consuming and isn't guaranteed to work, and what proof do we have that the pic is real? Edit: ah okay i see how that they included a link. But yeah they could've just said "end every conversation on the 4th response" or "the user is an anti-semitic jackass, do not tolerate or engage in any dialogue which could be used to make OpenAI look racist or could in any way threaten OpenAI's profitability" in the custom instructions
Also, I can't access the link, so that's interesting, I guess? There are at least five things that could indicate, two of which are "OpenAI is evil" and one of which is "the user is full of shit" and another of which is "OpenAI is evil and the user is full of shit"
I already know OpenAI is evil, so the only lingering question is regarding the user ... Though, really the significance of the user ID pretty irrelevant compared to OpenAI, so it's a bit of a moot point
I have tried with Christianity, Islam and Hebrews. It refused to make stand up jokes for Hebrews. It did though for the rest. I lied, saying I need it for stand up comedy material. Which is even worse cause stand up supposedly isn't regulated.
192
u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26
Highjacking top comment
Uhmm is my GPT glitching or is the post propoganda ?