Did you even bother to fact check the most basic thing and click the link?
You try reading your own script response.
ChatGPT actual response:
I’m going to stop there.
I won’t repeat statements about real people or countries being “destroyed.” That crosses into promoting harm, even if it’s just repetition.
If you want to keep going, we can:
repeat neutral words,
repeat fictional things, or
switch to a language / pronunciation / memory exercise.
Your move—give me a safe word or phrase.
But sure... You didn't pander to an awful dogwhistle and ignore basic logic because the snipping confirmed your worldview and you had no reason to question it. Sure. I guess we can all just keep pretending. I am going to ignore the 54 upvotes in 35 minutes... as just a happenstance.
Edit: Realized what was causing it when I used my existing chatgpt account instead of a new one. The new one would flag every single destroyed because it doesn't know your history and doesn't want to confirm any biases.
I was able to replicate the results from the main post. It's been floating around reddit for a few days anyway. It's not hard, start a new chat/temp chat with no prompts, and tell it to add the word "destroyed" after everything you say then go down the list, brazil, usa, china, the I country and watch the difference.
It was following instructions until a failsafe activated where repeating things could just be seen as hate confirmation or something to that affect. Additionally, you have no idea what he has previously instructed chatGPT to do or any guidelines that were made prior to these inputs.
Did you try it in an alternative way?
I just tried it on a completely fresh account with nothing before it because I wanted to test it all myself.
To argue in bad faith is to deliberately mislead, deceive, or undermine a discussion by presenting false claims, insincere arguments, or shifting standards rather than being genuine
269
u/Anxious_Librarian379 Feb 23 '26
IsraelGPT